Recommended link to article:
OKSANA O. MEDVEDEVAа
аRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2020-22-1-98-102
Abstract:
The review was prepared on the basis of the materials of the expert section ‘Scientometry 2.0: Digital Restart’, which took place as part of the Gaidar Forum 2020. It is devoted to a discussion of the role of applied scientometrics in assessing the effectiveness of scientists, as well as the prospects and possibilities of digitalization of science. The ‘tyranny of indicators’ and the crisis of confidence among the academic community in any formal assessment of their activities is one of the most important trends in the field of scientific administration in recent years. The object of public criticism is applied scientometrics as a tool for this assessment. During the discussion, experts made a number of significant comments regarding the widespread use of applied scientometrics. First, scientometric awareness needs to be formed. Scientometrics can be useful for both researchers and organizations. Scientometric literacy needs to be educated. It is such an approach for the future that can be an important step towards overcoming the systemic crisis in assessing scientific activity. Secondly, the scientometric assessment should be supported by expert assessment. If the first formalizes the assessment process and makes the management system more transparent, the second fills it with meaningful meaning. Thirdly, the digital transformation in the management of scientific activity at the moment is not able to remove the contradiction that has arisen. Moreover, as follows from the expert’s speech, neither the scientific community, nor the scientific management system itself, is yet ready for digital transformation.
Keywords:
scientometrics, performance indicators, digitalization, academic community, bibliometry, databases
Received:
February 13, 2020
References:
Chebotarev P.J. Scientometrics: how to use it to treat, not to cripple? In: Upravlenie bolshimi sistemami: sbornik trudov. 2013. № 44. P. 14–31. In Russian
Evans P. Money, Output and Goodhart’s Law: the U.S. Experience. In: Review of Economics and Statistics. 1985. Vol. LXVII. № 1. P. 1–8. In English
Kuleshova A.V., Podvojskij D.G. Paradoxes of publication activity in the field of modern Russian science: genesis, diagnosis, trends. In: Monitoring obshchestvennogo mnenija: Ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny. 2018. № 4. P. 169–210. In Russian
Mihajlov O.V. Bibliometric indexes and Russian science. In: Naukovedcheskie issledovanija. 2016. P. 155–167. In Russian
Muller J.Z. The tyranny of indicators: how obsession with numbers threatens education, health, business, and government. M.: Alpina pablisher, 2019. 210 p. In Russian
Orlov A.I. Scientometrics and management of scientific activities. In: Upravlenie bolshimi sistemami: sbornik trudov. 2013. № 44. P. 538–568. In Russian
Shore C. Audit culture and Illiberal Governance: Universities and the Politics of Accountability. In: Anthropological Theory. 2008. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 278–298. In English
Tulchinskij G.L. Digital transformation of education: challenges to higher education. In: Filosofskie nauki. 2017. № 6. P. 121–136. In Russian
Articles in Open Access mode are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license.
