Some problems of applying conciliation procedures in the resolution of corporate disputes complicated by a foreign element

Journal articles, New world norms

Recommended link to article:
Chekulaev S.S. , Some problems of applying conciliation procedures in the resolution of corporate disputes complicated by a foreign element // Public Administration,
2021, №1 (129)
, с. 56-64.

SERGEY SERGEYEVICH CHEKULAEVа

аFar Eastern Federal University

DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-1-56-64

Abstract:
The article describes the perspectives for using mediation to resolve corporate disputes complicated by a foreign element, when it is necessary to resolve possible conflicts by reaching consensus between the parties. When using conciliation procedures, one should consider different states of the relevant national legislation and regional international agreements, and also take into account not only the interests and interpretation of the problem situation from the position of the participant – the party to the dispute, but also the legislative regulation based on the current legal framework. One problematic issue in this area is the existence of several legal approaches. Cooperation is often complicated by the likelihood of a negative outcome. Conflicts of interest can lead to unwanted consequences. One of the most effective ways for settling conflicts is the use of conciliation procedures: negotiations, mediation, mediation and judicial conciliation, as well as other procedures that do not contradict the current legislation. In general, mediation is seen as a flexible process that supports the autonomy of the parties, legal and nonlegal approaches to problem solving and creative individual solutions. In addition, the issue of choosing conciliation procedure for resolving a dispute can be resolved by participants in corporate relations even before the conflict arises by fixing a mediation clause in the local documents of the organization.

Keywords:
conciliation procedures, conflict, parties, negotiations, conversation, mediation, dispute, corporate relations

Received:
October 2, 2020

References:
Bartsits I.N. Governance Efficiency Criteria and Global Governance Space. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2009. No. 3. P. 12-20. In Russian
Bryzhinskii A.A. Alternative Resolution of Legal Disputes and Conflicts. Abstract of the Dissertation of Candidate of Juridical Sciences. Saransk, 2006. 24 p. In Russian
Deltsova N.V. Negotiations as a Way of Resolving Legal Conflicts in Business. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V. N. Tatishcheva. 2017. No. 1. Vol. 2. P. 72-76. In Russian
Zasemkova O.F. Singapore Convention on Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements (Mediation): from Dream to Reality? Lex russica. 2019. No. 3. P. 60-72. In Russian
Zaitsev V.V., Rybakov V.A. On Science of Civil Law: Methodological and Doctrinal Aspects. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. 2016. No. 4. P. 58-65. In Russian
Nosyreva E.I., Filchenko D.G. Main Provisions of the Concept on the Institution for Reconciliation of the Parties in Civil Proceedings (Second Part). 2015. No. 2. P. 140-155. In Russian
Primak T.A., Zaitsev O.V. The Dispositive Principle as Basis for Economic Relations Development. Vestnik Baltiiskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. 2014. No. 3. P. 126-130. In Russian
Streltsova E.G. Negotiations as a Pre-Trial Procedure for Dispute Resolution: Problematic Issues of the Newly Adopted Amendments to the Arbitress Procedure Code. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2016. No. 9. P. 35-38. In Russian
Shemeneva O.N. Procedural Aspects of Negotiating as Conciliation Procedure in Civil Proceedings. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2019. No. 2. P. 47-51. In Russian

Articles in Open Access mode are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *