Scientific basis for managing the transition to sustainability in the Netherlands

Journal articles, Sustainable development

Recommended link to article:
Tolganbaeva G.A., Scientific basis for managing the transition to sustainability in the Netherlands // Public Administration,
2021, №4 (132)
, с. 43-50.

GULMIRA ADYLKANOVNA TOLGANBAEVAа

аThe Canada Eurasia Russia Business Association

DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2021-23-4-43-50

Abstract:
The article analyzes the scientific approaches of Dutch scientists to the problems of managing the transition to sustainable development. Based on the analysis of research in the Netherlands, the author concludes on the methodological dominance of the coevolutionary concept and the theory of complex systems. The transition to sustainable development is seen as coevolutionary social change. Coevolution of sustainable development implies the possibility of transforming the processes of coevolution into a more sustainable way of development. The essence of managing the transition to sustainable development is goal-oriented modulation and directed coordination of all actors involved in this process. Transition management is viewed as a particular form of multilevel governance in which state and non-state actors work together to co-produce and coordinate policies in an iterative and coevolutionary way at different levels. The necessary qualities of such management are adaptability, reflexivity, and coherence of actors’ positions. Adaptive transition management involves the social learning of management actors based on problem structuring and strategic experimentation. Transition management combines elements of long-term planning, elements of incremental market approach, and social network interaction management techniques. Distinctive characteristics of such management are heterarchy, three-tiered structure, and distributed administration. Since transition management is aimed at long-term change of functional systems in a gradual way, with the use of variations and their selection, its implementation is possible in a society whose interests are well organized, and there is no authoritarian management. The considered scientific foundations for managing the transition to sustainable development are used in the Netherlands to manage the transition to sustainable energy, sustainable mobility, sustainable agriculture, sustainable water use, and the transition to biodiversity and natural resources. In Russia and Kazakhstan, it is possible to use this approach to select, organize and structure management styles and tools for managing the transition to sustainable development.

Keywords:
sustainable development, sustainable development management, social transition, the Netherlands, strategic management, management theory

Received:
September 1, 2021

References:
Eising R., Kohler-Koch B. The transformation of governance in the European Union. London: Routledge, 1999. In English
Grunwald A. Technology policy between long-term planning requirements and short-ranged acceptance problems. New challenges for technology assessment // Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology assessment / edited by J. Grin and A. Grunwald. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2000. P. 99–148. In English
Jessop B. The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance // Beyond market and Hierarchy. Interactive Governance and Social Complexity / edited by A. Amin and J. Hausner. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997. P. 111–147. In English
Kemp R., Rotmans J. The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems // Towards Environmental Innovation Systems / M. Weber and J. Hemmelskamp (eds). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2005. P. 33–55. In English
Kemp R., Loorbach D., Rotmans J. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. 2007. No. 14 (1). P. 78–91. In English
Kemp R., Parto S., Gibson R.B. Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. The International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2005. Vol. 8. No. 1-2. P. 12–30. In English
Kemp R., Rotmans J. Managing the transition to sustainable mobility // System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy / B. Elzen, F.W. Geels and K. Green (eds). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, 2005. P. 137–167. In English
Kemp R., Schot J., Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation. The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 1998. No. 10 (2). P. 175–195. In English
Kemp R., Soete L. The greening of technological progress: An evolutionary perspective. Futures. 1992. No. 24 (5). P. 437–457. In English
Lee K.N., Shabecoff P. Compass and gyroscope. Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington DC: Island Press, 1994. In English
Loorbach D. Governance and transitions: a multi-level policyframework based on complex systems thinking / Paper read at Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Berlin, 2004. https://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/ akumwelt/bc2004/download/loorbach_f.pdf In English
Loorbach D. Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. North. 2007. Vol. 193 (4). In English
Loorbach D., Rotmans J. Managing transitions for sustainable development // Understanding Industrial Transformation: views from different disciplines / A.J. Wieczorek and X. Olsthoorn (eds). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2006. P. 187– 206. In English
March J.G., Olsen J.P. Democratic governance. New York: The Free Press, 1995. In English
Mayntz R. Governing failures and the problem of governability: some comments on a theoretical paradigm // Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions / J. Kooiman (ed.). London: Sage, 1994. P. 9–20. In English
Meadowcroft J. Planning for sustainable development: what can be learned from the critics? // Planning sustainability / M. Kenny and J. Meadowcroft (eds). London and New York: Routledge, 1999. P. 12–38. In English
Nelson R.R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy. 1990. No. 19 (3). P. 193–214. In English
Pierre J. Debating Governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. In English
Quinn J.B. Strategic change: logical incrementalism. Sloan Management Review. 1978. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 7–19. In English
Quinn J.B. Strategies for change: logical incrementalism. Homewood: Irwi, 1980. In English ,
Rip A., Kemp R. Technological change // Human choice and climate change / S. Rayner and E. L. Malone (eds). Columbus OH: Battelle Press, 1998. Vol. 2. P. 327–399. In English
Rosenhead J., Mingers J. Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. London: Wiley and Sons, 2002. In English
Rotmans J. Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modelling and Assessment. 1998. No. 3. P. 155– 179. In English
Rotmans J. Societal innovation: between dream and reality lies complexity. Inaugural Speech, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2005. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/emseuriar/7293. htm. In English
Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M. More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy. Foresight. 2001. No. 3(1). P. 15–31. In English
Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M., Geels F., Verbong G., Molendijk K. Transities & transitie management. De casus van een emissiearme energievoorziening. Final report of study «Transitions and Transition management» for the 4th National Environmental Policy Plan (NMP-4) of the Netherlands. Maastricht: ICIS & MERIT, October 2000.
System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy / edited by Boilie Elizen, Frank W. Geels, Ken Green. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005. In English
Van de Ven A.H, Garud R. The co-evolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation // Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations / J.A. Baum and J.V. Singh (eds). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. P. 425–443. In English
Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Stagl S. Co-evolution of economic behavior and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2003. No. 13 (3). P. 289–317. In English
Voss J.P., Kemp R., Bauknecht D. Reflexive governance: a view on the emerging path // Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development / J.P. Voss, D. Bauknecht and R. Kemp (eds). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006. P. 419–438. In English

Articles in Open Access mode are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *