An opinion on the “Еlectrograd” project in the Minusinsk valley through the prism of social design experience of atomic catfs

Recommended link to article:

ALEXEY I. ZVEREV^а

^аUral Institute of Management – branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

SERGEY M. KARACHKOV^b

^bUral Plant of Chemical Engineering

DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2022-24-2-62-67

Abstract:
The article considers significant social and managerial features of developing the “Minusinsk” project/ Electrograd city in the Minusinsk Valley as one of the large-scale state projects, including creating and developing urban sites of presence. The analysis is conducted using the successful experience of designing closed administrativeterritorial formations (CATFs) as sites of presence of the USSR Atomic Project. The purpose of this atomic project was to ensure parity in the Cold War, an “arms race”, and the creation of national “Nuclear shield”. The authors are interested in applying the project approach methodology to analyzing the “Minusinsk” project as well as using the concept of forming a value core of corporatism in CATF to increase motivation, involvement, and cohesion of city residents around the project. Currently, the “Minusinsk” project barely considers the need to provide cities of presence with corporate identity, a particular spirit that would motivate, unite, and involve citizens in the project’s implementation from within. Given the successful practice of creating and developing the Atomic project and nuclear CATFs, the development and further social reproduction of the value core of corporatism can improve performance and become a fundamental condition for their implementation. The authors conclude that within the “Minusinsk” project, the use of corporatism involves setting a goal of state importance, which is fixed structurally, organizationally, programmatically, and has a detailed project.

Keywords:
Minusinsk project, Electrograd, value core, corporatism of CATF, project approach, subject and actor of management, management of CATF, designing the city’s social environment

Received:
December 18, 2021

References:
Alklychev A.M., Zoidov K.Kh. Railroad transportation for the territorial development of Siberia and the Far East. EKO. 2011. No. 8 (446). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zheleznodorozhnyy-transport-dlya-territorialnogo-razvitiya-sibiri-i-dalnego-vostoka. In Russian
Karachkov S.M. Development of social management model at the nuclear closed city in the modern period. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2013. No. 12. http://teoria-practica.ru/ vipusk-12-2013/. In Russian
Kostin V.A. Control theory. Yekaterinburg: UrAGS, 2001. In Russian
Kostin V.A., Kostina N.B. Strategic management. Yekaterinburg: UrAGS, 2007. In Russian
Kostina N.B., Duran T.V., Kalugina N.M. Theory of management. Moscow: Infra-M, 2017. In Russian
Tsykunov G.A. Soviet experience in the development of Siberia. Istoriko-ekonomicheskiye issledovaniya. 2014. No. 2. https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovetskiy-opyt-osvoeniya-sibiri. In Russian
Zverev A.I., Karachkov S.M. Corporate model of social governance in atomic CATF: the bases of theoretical reconstruction. Upravlenets. 2012. No. 9-10. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativnaya-model-sotsialnogo-upravleniya-atomnym-zato-osnovaniya-teoreticheskoy-rekonstruktsii. In Russian

Articles in Open Access mode are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license.